We can represent that in the supply and demand diagram with a vertical line at the quantity that we think people need. It's a vertical line because "need" is the same regardless of the price.
When the supply-demand intersection point is to the left of the "need" level, then the amount actually bought or sold is less than the "need." One way to raise the actual amount bought and sold is to raise demand. The diagram above shows that if you raise demand, you can move the equilibrium quantity out to the "needed" level. As the diagram also shows, this tends to raise the price.
For this to work, the supply curve can't be so steep that it does not reach the Need line. In real life, this would mean that raising demand works if the supply will be forthcoming if the price goes high enough.
The alternative way to get the equilibrium quantity out to the need is to raise supply. This means moving the supply curve to the right. As the preceding video showed, raising the supply curve makes quantity go up and makes the price go down.
For example, suppose that the President decides that war veterans need more health care services than they are currently getting.
Here are some more tactics for manipulating where the supply and demand curves cross. See if you can tell which do that by changing demand and which by changing supply.
You run advertisements telling men that they need get their
prostates
tested. What does this change in the market for prostate examinations?
Raises demand
Raises supply
You give pregnant women coupons for free fast food after they complete
a
certain number of prenatal visits. (Laugh if you like, but this was
actually done in South
Carolina in the 1990s.) What does this change in the market for
prenatal care visits?
Raises demand
Raises supply
You give doctors free vaccine. What does this change in the market for
inoculations?
Raises demand
Raises supply
The same ideas work in reverse if you think people are buying more of something than they need. For example...
You put a scary message of every pack of cigarettes. What does this
change in the market for cigarettes?
You put a tax on every pack of cigarettes. What does this change in the
market for cigarettes?
You forbid smoking in many places that are open to the public.
In the movie above, I have the demand curve stopping its move to the right when the equilibrium quantity gets to the Need. If the demand curve kept going to the right, the equilibrium quantity would be greater than the Need. Some economists argue that health insurance with no copayment moves the demand curve so far to the right that the equilibrium quantity of services exceeds what people really need.
A digression about sin taxes, like the cigarette tax ...
You can regard the cigarette tax as increasing the cost of supplying the cigarettes. Adding a tax raises the cost per pack by the amount of the tax. The diagram here shows the effect. The supply curve moves down, which is to the left in this diagram. The vertical distance between the old supply curve (shown in black) and the new supply curve (shown in red) is the amount of the tax per pack. The equilibrium quantity supplied and demanded is lower (more to the left). That is the intended goal of the tax increase.
If the supply curve has a positive slope, so that it's not horizontal (which means that supply is not completely elastic), then the price increase (the distance between the blue and red horizontal lines) will be less than the tax increase. This means that the customers and the sellers will share paying the tax on each pack bought. When a supply curve has an upward slope, it is because some sellers have higher costs than other sellers. When the tax is imposed, some high-cost sellers drop out of the market. The lower-cost sellers who stay in make less profit.
Suppose you make it illegal to sell a certain drug.
Suppose an HMO makes it harder for people to call up to make an
appointment. What does that change in the market for that HMO's health
insurance policy?
Please e-mail comments to